Home >
Issues
>
2008
Propositions
October 20,
2008
Temecula Valley, Murrieta and Lake
Elsinore Valley Chamber
Positions on the November
4, 2008 Propositions
The Southwest California Legislative Council (SWCLC), the
regional business advocacy coalition of the Temecula Valley,
Murrieta and Lake Elsinore Valley Chambers of Commerce,
releases its positions on the statewide propositions slated
on the November 4, 2008 ballot. The SWCLC takes
positions on issues directly impacting the business
community in the Southwest California region. November’s
election marks the final slate of propositions where voters
were involved in three elections and were asked to review
more than twenty statewide propositions throughout the year.
Proposition 1A – High-Speed Passenger Train Bond Act
Southwest California Legislative Council Position:
Oppose
Proposition 1, later renamed Proposition 1A, would allow
for $9.95 billion in bonds to be used to plan and
construct a high-speed train system from San Francisco
to Los Angeles and Orange County areas. Other phases
would allow for the possibility to extend the line to
Riverside and San Diego County areas.
The
SWCLC believes in a time when the state budget continues
to have a deficit and in the state’s current economic
condition, it is not wise to set aside more budget
dollars for a project that may take 20 years to build
and operate.
Proposition 2 – Standards for Confining Farm Animals
Southwest California Legislative Council Position:
Oppose
This
measure would prohibit certain confinements of farms
animals including calves for veal, egg-laying hens, and
pregnant pigs.
Proposition 2 would impact most of the egg production
facilities in California, leading to higher costs to
consumers and driving egg production businesses out of
the state. Agriculture businesses continue to be
targeted for more restrictions than any other type of
business in the state.
Proposition 3 – Children’s Hospital Bond Act
Southwest California Legislative Council Position:
Oppose
Proposition 3 authorizes the state to sell $980 million
in general obligation bonds for capital improvement
projects at children’s hospitals. The measure
specifically identifies the five University of
California children’s hospitals as eligible bond fund
recipients.
The
Children’s Hospital Bond Act would allow specific
children’s hospitals to continue improvement projects
that have already been approved and are in the works.
Voters approved a similar Proposition only a few years
ago. It is unreasonable to ask voters once again to
approve funding for private institutions, especially at
a time with a continued budget deficit.
Proposition 7 – Renewable Energy Generation
Southwest California Legislative Council Position:
Oppose
Proposition 7 would require all utilities, both private
and public, to generate 20% of their power from
renewable energy by 2010 and setting benchmarks for all
utilities to generate their power from renewable energy
at 40% by 2020 and 50% by 2025.
The
SWCLC believes in renewable energy and practical
applications in order to make the area and state less
dependent on nonrenewable energy. Unfortunately,
Proposition 7 is unreasonable as it sets unobtainable
benchmarks for private and public utilities to reach.
This will ultimately lead to higher rate costs passed
onto consumers.
Proposition 10 – Alternative Fuel Vehicles and Renewable
Energy
Southwest California Legislative Council Position:
Oppose
$5
billion in general obligation bonds would be sold by the
state for various renewable energy, alternative fuel and
energy efficiency and air emissions reduction services.
The
SWCLC continues to support renewable energy and “green”
projects but Proposition 10 would create a financial
incentive program for only one type of alternative fuel
which would not allow for fair competition of tax payer
dollars for other alternative fuels that may lead to
greener practices. It also sets aside, once again,
dollars that could be used for balancing the budget.
Proposition 11 – Redistricting
Southwest California Legislative Council Position:
Support
Proposition 11 creates a 14-person citizens
redistricting commission that would redraw new boundary
lines for the State Senate and Assembly districts along
with the Board of Equalization districts. The commission
would be politically balanced - five democrats, five
republicans, and four individuals that are not
registered with one of the two major parties.
Commissioners would be chosen for their impartiality,
skills, and would reflect the State’s demographic and
geographic diversity.
The
Southwest California Legislative Council has been an
early supporter of Proposition 11. The SWCLC believes
this is the best way to eliminate the conflict of
interest when redrawing the district boundaries by
taking it out of the hands of the legislators.
The
Southwest California Legislative Council of Commerce has
“No Position” on the following Propositions:
Proposition 4 - Parental Notification Before Termination
of Minor’s Pregnancy
Proposition 5 - Nonviolent Drug Offenses. Sentencing,
Parole and Rehabilitation
Proposition 6 - Police and Law Enforcement Funding.
Criminal Penalties and Laws
Proposition 8 - Eliminates Right of Same-Sex Couples to
Marry
Proposition 9 - Criminal Justice System. Victims’
Rights. Parole
Proposition 12 - Veterans’ Bond Act of 2008
January 29,
2008
Southwest
California Businesses Take A Stand On June 2008 Ballot Propositions
The Temecula
Valley, Murrieta and Lake Elsinore Valley Chambers of
Commerce through their regional advocacy coalition, the
Southwest California Legislative Council (SWCLC) released
their positions on all statewide propositions on the
February 5, 2008 ballot.
“Each of the propositions play an important role in
impacting the economic vitality of California and our
region,” stated Greg Morrison, Chair of the SWCLC. “Our
business community needs to understand this impact and they
must play an active role by understanding how these
proposals impact jobs and our quality of life,” Morrison
continued.
Proposition 91 - Transportation Funding
SWCLC Position: NEUTRAL
The Southwest
California Legislative Council’s position on Proposition 91
is neutral because it would prohibit the use of funds that
are earmarked for transportation to be used for anything
else other than transportation related issues after July
2008. While this may not be a bad concept, the
SWCLC believes
that other avenues of borrowing funds need to be looked into
and the passage of Proposition 1A from last year’s election
already limits the use of funds for anything other than
transportation.
Generally, this
proposition eliminates General Fund borrowing of specified
transportation funds, except for cash-flow purposes. Those
require repayment within 30 days of adoption of budget which
the current law allows borrowing for three years when the
Governor declares the transfer would cause significant
negative fiscal impact on governmental functions.
Proposition
92 - Community Colleges
SWCLC Position: OPPOSE
The Southwest
California Legislative Council opposes Proposition 92 and
urges businesses to do the same. Proposition 92 would place
a strain on the already maxed out state budget. The
following points were considered when the position was
established:
- Change current
minimum education funding requirement into two separate
requirements: one for K–12 schools and one for the
California Community Colleges (CCC).
- Lower
community college education fees from $20 per unit to $15
per unit.
- Significantly limit the state’s authority to increase fee
levels in future
years.
- Formally
establish the community colleges in the State Constitution.
- Increase the size of the community colleges’ state Board
of Governors (BOG) and its authority.
- California’s
budget deficit, projected to increase to over 8 billion
dollars in 2008, will be aggravated by Prop 92.
Proposition 93 - Limits on Legislator's Terms in Office
SWCLC Position: OPPOSE
Proposition 93
would reduce the total amount of time a person may serve in
the state legislature from 14 years to 12 years. This would
allow an individual to serve a total of 12 years either in
the Assembly, the Senate, or a combination of both. The
proposition provides a transition period to allow current
members to serve a total of 12 consecutive years in the
house in which they are currently serving, regardless of any
prior service in another house.
Proposition 93
does not go far enough because term limits must be a part of
a comprehensive reform of term limits and redistricting. The
SWCLC urges state leaders to reform the State’s
redistricting process as a means towards total political
reform in California.
Propositions
94, 95, 96, 97 - Indian Gaming
SWCLC Position: SUPPORT
Governor Schwarzenegger negotiated new Indian gaming
agreements (The Compacts) with four tribes; Agua Caliente
Band of Cahuilla Indians, Morongo Band of Mission Indians,
Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and Sycuan Band of the
Kumeyaay Nation have casino facilities on remote reservation
lands in Riverside and San Diego counties. The four
propositions represent each of the negotiated new Indian
gaming compacts.
The four propositions seek to overturn law passed by the
legislature in 2007 that expands gaming machines at the Agua
Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Morongo Band of Mission
Indians, Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and Sycuan Band
of the Kumeyaay Nation Casinos. The compacts will also call
for the four tribes to pay a much higher percentage of their
gaming revenues to the state in return for having additional
slot machines. The revenue paid by the tribes – an estimated
$9 billion over the next two decades – can be used to pay
down the budget deficit and may be used as new funding for
schools, public safety and other services.