|
Home >
Issues
>
Paid Vacation
July 15, 2009
Chambers Oppose Costly Federal Paid Vacation Mandate
The Southwest California Legislative Council opposes a
federal legislative proposal that would mandated paid
vacation for full and part-time employees. The first of
its kind at the federal level, H.R. 2564 would be costly
to employers at a time when unemployment rates have
continued to climb as both large and small businesses
struggle in a fragile economy.
“Time and time again we have opposed state mandated paid
vacation proposals and see no other reason but to
continue to oppose this type of mandate at the federal
level,” stated Roger Ziemer, Chair of the Southwest
California Legislative Council. “Mandates of any kind
are not the right way to do business in California or
anywhere in the country for that matter. We believe
business needs to remain vigilant as the legislative
session moves on in order to protect jobs and the cost
of doing business in Lake Elsinore,” continued Ziemer.
H.R. 2564, also known as the Paid Vacation Act of 2009,
comes at a time when businesses may not be able to
afford extra vacation time and would also limit the
benefits an employer may currently offer to its
employees such as bonuses.
Details of H.R. 2564:
• Full- and part-time (25 hours per week/1250 hours per
year) workers will be eligible after one year of
service.
• “Eligible employee” means an employee who has been
employed for at least 12 months by the employer with
respect to whom leave is requested and has accumulated
at least 1,250 hours of service with such employer
during such 12-month period.
3 years after the date of enactment of H.R. 2564
following would also be allowed:
• Eligible employee of an employer that employs 50 or
more employees at any time during a calendar year shall
be entitled to a total of 1 workweek of paid vacation
during each 12-month period.
• Eligible employees of an employer that employs 100 or
more employees shall be entitled to a total of 2
workweeks of paid vacation during each 12-month period,
beginning on that eligible employee's first anniversary
of employment.
• H.R. 2564 requires an eligible employee shall provide
the employer with not less than 30 days' notice, before
the date the paid vacation is to begin and identify the
date such paid vacation shall begin.
|
|
|
We Mean
Business


We
hold our
elected officials accountable to
issues that impact job creation throughout Southwest
California.


Find
out how our elected officials rank on those issues.


Click for the
2008 Vote Record
|
|